After 2 terms we finished our action research. Marie and I have one more presentation on it to make to staff. With writing, 2 terms hasn't seemed enough time to make a huge difference. There was improvement but only within the level. I think in hindsight that my choices of students made it harder. This was because they had other factors which impinged on their ability or willingness to improve, eg home circumstances, and suspected processing disability.
Overall, I think doing the action research helped me focus my teaching. Sometimes, when reflecting about it I wonder would I have done anything different, as with the ASTLE identification of needs to focus on, I had to do a lot of it anyway. I would have liked more computers so that those other students in my class who would have like more opportunity to use a computer too, could have had said opportunity.
One of the students that I focused on believed he thought better using a computer. I never found it so for this student when I sat alongside trying to get the thinking and links into the story to improve it, but who is to say it is not for other students, or this student in a few months or years. The idea that "Oooh, look at me I am on a computer," is still a prevalent thought at my school, and still a distraction, so the thinking is still to come. For the more mature/responsible student this is not so. They do focus, and attempt the new learning that I am trying to instill.
I found it interesting that Marie and I chose different approaches to our action research because of the year levels that we teach, and because of our professional goals that we had set at the beginning of the year. Marie did lots of modelling with the mimio, and students using kidpix to draw, and create their stories, whereas, I used the mimio also for modelling, a little bit of kidpix drawing, and direct typing into the computer to overcome the student's dislike of using pen and paper because of poor fine motor skills. I also had student retell stories during reading time; ( a time honoured method of integration).
Showing posts with label action research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label action research. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Action Research
Marie and I finished our Action research project last week. It has been interesting that we have both approached the same task from a different angle because we teach different class levels. Marie worked more on using ICT tools for modelling, and I got my kids onto the computer write. Sometimes I got them to plan or draw first or they just typed straight into the computer. One student reckoned he thought better at the computer but I found no evidence of this especially as he needed teacher help and assistence to get a story structure in place, and struggled with understanding that lots of detail needed to go in to explain to his audience how his characters came to be there. The research was interesting in that some of my kids inproved and some did not. I think that for it to have worked more throughly, I needed to have had a longer time to work with my students. 2 terms was not enough. I sometimes found it difficult to maintain due to various and frequent times out of the classroom. On a more positive note, I found that giving opportunities across the class to go on the computers made it slightly competitive for a chance, and when they had the opportunity tried even harder with their writing.
Action Research Writing
View more presentations from Botany Downs School.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Action Research - Writing
I am finding this hard to do. When I set a task students who do not have access to the computer can get envious though I say we have to share but it is tricky with 4 computers and 27 children. I do notice the children I have targeted for the research do work better on the compter, even if just typing their writing straight into word. Two of the students have long term habits of little writing, and task avoidence. Suggestions for improvements can be a struggle. I think longer term, using a computer all the time would help these students.
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Writing
I scanned in some introductions from a couple of books as examples of narrative beginnings. We looked at them as a class, and then I sent 2 of the targeted students to write their example on the computer. I had done this the previous day as well, but interestingly enough it worked better the second day, as these 2 students were keen to be on the computer. They did not write much but they were much more enthusiastic. I live in hope.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
